Skoda Fabia II
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Skoda Roomster 1.6
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Fabia II
Car A
Skoda Fabia II
Efficient for its class and easy to live with in the city, the Skoda Fabia II pairs 5 L/100km consumption with usable space for five and a 330 L trunk. It’s a good value pick for cost-conscious buyers that still want adequate performance (0–100 km/h in 9.5 s).
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5 L/100km
Skoda Roomster 1.6
Car B
Skoda Roomster 1.6
The Skoda Roomster 1.6 is a budget-minded, city-focused compact with enough space for small-family duties. It prioritizes efficiency and everyday usability over performance or premium features.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety
Why compared same body typesame brandsame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 62 / 56
City 77 / 61
Budget / value 76 / 69
Road trip 29 / 35
Performance 29 / 32
Cargo 18 / 22
Practical 52 / 50
Premium 13 / 17
Winter 20 / 22

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Fabia II · Orange = Skoda Roomster 1.6

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Fabia II Skoda Roomster 1.6
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Fabia II

  • Efficient for its class at 5 L/100km combined
  • Good value in its segment at a listed 15000
  • Works for small families: 5 seats and a 330 L trunk
  • Quick enough for city and highway merges (0–100 km/h in 9.5 s)

Skoda Roomster 1.6

  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km, easing fuel costs
  • Good value in its segment at a 19000 price point
  • Practical 5-seat layout with a 400-liter trunk for everyday needs
  • Strong reliability ranking for low-hassle ownership

Verdict

Pick Skoda Fabia II if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Fabia II uses 5.0 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Skoda Roomster 1.6 if…
Performance & capability
Skoda Roomster 1.6 is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons