Skoda Fabia II
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Honda Fit 2010
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Fabia II
Car A
Skoda Fabia II
Efficient for its class and easy to live with in the city, the Skoda Fabia II pairs 5 L/100km consumption with usable space for five and a 330 L trunk. It’s a good value pick for cost-conscious buyers that still want adequate performance (0–100 km/h in 9.5 s).
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5 L/100km
Honda Fit 2010
Car B
Honda Fit 2010
The 2010 Honda Fit offers good value in its segment, balancing city-friendly efficiency with everyday practicality. With reliability and safety as key strengths, it suits commuters and small families who need usable space without excess cost.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety117 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 62 / 66
City 77 / 74
Budget / value 76 / 75
Road trip 29 / 30
Performance 29 / 29
Cargo 18 / 22
Practical 52 / 54
Premium 13 / 13
Winter 20 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Fabia II · Orange = Honda Fit 2010

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Fabia II Honda Fit 2010
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Fabia II

  • Efficient for its class at 5 L/100km combined
  • Good value in its segment at a listed 15000
  • Works for small families: 5 seats and a 330 L trunk
  • Quick enough for city and highway merges (0–100 km/h in 9.5 s)

Honda Fit 2010

  • Good value in its segment at a listed price of 15000
  • Efficient for its class (6.5 L/100 km), well-suited to city driving
  • Practical for small-family duties with five seats and a 400 L trunk
  • Emphasis on reliability and safety among its strengths

Verdict

Pick Skoda Fabia II if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Fabia II uses 5.0 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda Fit 2010 if…
More power
Honda Fit 2010 puts out 117 hp vs 105 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons