Kia Picanto GT
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Skoda Roomster 1.6
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Kia Picanto GT
Car A
Kia Picanto GT
The Kia Picanto GT focuses on city driving with strong efficiency and good value for its segment, while offering just enough performance for everyday traffic. Five seats and a useful 255 L boot make it practical for urban families and commuters, though it isn’t aimed at cargo-heavy or premium tastes.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5.5 L/100km
Skoda Roomster 1.6
Car B
Skoda Roomster 1.6
The Skoda Roomster 1.6 is a budget-minded, city-focused compact with enough space for small-family duties. It prioritizes efficiency and everyday usability over performance or premium features.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety105 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 59 / 56
City 75 / 61
Budget / value 72 / 69
Road trip 25 / 35
Performance 29 / 32
Cargo 14 / 22
Practical 49 / 50
Premium 14 / 17
Winter 20 / 22

Scores out of 100. Blue = Kia Picanto GT · Orange = Skoda Roomster 1.6

Specs side-by-side

Spec Kia Picanto GT Skoda Roomster 1.6
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Kia Picanto GT

  • Efficient for its class, keeping fuel costs down.
  • Quick enough for city traffic with 0–100 km/h in 9.8 s.
  • Five seats and a 255 L boot cover daily errands and school runs.
  • Priced for value, appealing to budget-focused buyers.

Skoda Roomster 1.6

  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km, easing fuel costs
  • Good value in its segment at a 19000 price point
  • Practical 5-seat layout with a 400-liter trunk for everyday needs
  • Strong reliability ranking for low-hassle ownership

Verdict

Pick Kia Picanto GT if…
Best fuel economy
Kia Picanto GT uses 5.5 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Skoda Roomster 1.6 if…
More power
Skoda Roomster 1.6 puts out 105 hp vs 100 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons