Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Skoda Fabia II
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC
Car A
Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC
The Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC suits city driving with very low consumption and good value in its segment. It prioritizes efficiency and simple practicality over speed and cargo capacity.
4 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety3.4 L/100km
Skoda Fabia II
Car B
Skoda Fabia II
Efficient for its class and easy to live with in the city, the Skoda Fabia II pairs 5 L/100km consumption with usable space for five and a 330 L trunk. It’s a good value pick for cost-conscious buyers that still want adequate performance (0–100 km/h in 9.5 s).
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety105 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame usage profilesimilar pricestrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 47 / 62
City 79 / 77
Budget / value 74 / 76
Road trip 18 / 29
Performance 38 / 29
Cargo 11 / 18
Practical 49 / 52
Premium 9 / 13
Winter 16 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC · Orange = Skoda Fabia II

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC Skoda Fabia II
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC

  • Very low combined consumption (3.4) keeps running costs down
  • Good value in its segment at a 15000 price point
  • 4 seats and a 251-liter trunk cover daily errands
  • Reliability ranks as a strength in our signals

Skoda Fabia II

  • Efficient for its class at 5 L/100km combined
  • Good value in its segment at a listed 15000
  • Works for small families: 5 seats and a 330 L trunk
  • Quick enough for city and highway merges (0–100 km/h in 9.5 s)

Verdict

Pick Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC uses 3.4 L/100km vs 5.0 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Skoda Fabia II if…
More power
Skoda Fabia II puts out 105 hp vs 68 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons