Peugeot 5008 Active Premium
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI
Suv · Gasoline
Peugeot 5008 Active Premium
Car A
Peugeot 5008 Active Premium
The Peugeot 5008 Active Premium prioritizes seven-seat practicality, a vast 780-liter boot, and a 5-star safety rating while remaining efficient for its class at 6 L/100km. Its 130 hp and 9.5 s 0–100 km/h make performance more relaxed than sporty.
7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety6 L/100km
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI
Car B
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI
The Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI prioritizes space and efficiency for large families, with seven seats, an 835-liter boot, and 6.5 L/100 km consumption. It isn’t built for performance or luxury, but it handles daily and road-trip duties capably.
7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety150 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 90 / 92
City 37 / 37
Budget / value 62 / 63
Road trip 69 / 70
Performance 28 / 26
Cargo 57 / 60
Practical 65 / 66
Premium 31 / 31
Winter 40 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Peugeot 5008 Active Premium · Orange = Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI

Specs side-by-side

Spec Peugeot 5008 Active Premium Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Peugeot 5008 Active Premium

  • Efficient for its class at 6 L/100km combined
  • True 7-seat versatility for large families
  • Huge 780-liter cargo capacity for everyday practicality and trips
  • 5-star safety rating adds reassurance

Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI

  • Seven seats and an 835-liter boot serve large families
  • 6.5 L/100 km consumption is efficient for its class
  • 0–100 km/h in 8.4 s delivers confident everyday pace
  • Petrol simplicity suits frequent road trips and mixed driving

Verdict

Pick Peugeot 5008 Active Premium if…
Best fuel economy
Peugeot 5008 Active Premium uses 6.0 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI if…
More power
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI puts out 150 hp vs 130 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons