Mazda CX-80
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI
Suv · Gasoline
Mazda CX-80
Car A
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 targets large families with seven seats, everyday practicality, and running costs that are efficient for its class. It balances space and performance while offering good value in its segment.
7 seatsSuvGasoline200 hp
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI
Car B
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI
The Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI prioritizes space and efficiency for large families, with seven seats, an 835-liter boot, and 6.5 L/100 km consumption. It isn’t built for performance or luxury, but it handles daily and road-trip duties capably.
7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 52 / 92
City 33 / 37
Budget / value 45 / 63
Road trip 42 / 70
Performance 27 / 26
Cargo 41 / 60
Practical 44 / 66
Premium 24 / 31
Winter 28 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-80 · Orange = Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-80 Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-80

  • Seven-seat flexibility suits large families
  • 510 L cargo space supports errands and trips
  • Efficient for its class at 8.5 L/100 km
  • 200 hp and 7.5 s 0–100 km/h aid confident merging

Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI

  • Seven seats and an 835-liter boot serve large families
  • 6.5 L/100 km consumption is efficient for its class
  • 0–100 km/h in 8.4 s delivers confident everyday pace
  • Petrol simplicity suits frequent road trips and mixed driving

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-80 if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Mazda CX-80 is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI if…
Performance & capability
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons