Skoda Fabia II
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Peugeot 208 GT Line
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Fabia II
Car A
Skoda Fabia II
Efficient for its class and easy to live with in the city, the Skoda Fabia II pairs 5 L/100km consumption with usable space for five and a 330 L trunk. It’s a good value pick for cost-conscious buyers that still want adequate performance (0–100 km/h in 9.5 s).
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Peugeot 208 GT Line
Car B
Peugeot 208 GT Line
The Peugeot 208 GT Line pairs efficient city driving with strong safety and good value in its segment. Its 130 hp setup is lively enough for everyday use while maintaining a 4.6 L/100 km combined figure.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety4.6 L/100km130 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 62 / 60
City 77 / 75
Budget / value 76 / 68
Road trip 29 / 29
Performance 29 / 30
Cargo 18 / 17
Practical 52 / 51
Premium 13 / 17
Winter 20 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Fabia II · Orange = Peugeot 208 GT Line

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Fabia II Peugeot 208 GT Line
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Fabia II

  • Efficient for its class at 5 L/100km combined
  • Good value in its segment at a listed 15000
  • Works for small families: 5 seats and a 330 L trunk
  • Quick enough for city and highway merges (0–100 km/h in 9.5 s)

Peugeot 208 GT Line

  • Efficient for its class at 4.6 L/100 km combined.
  • Five-star safety rating for added peace of mind.
  • 130 hp, 230 Nm and 8.7 s 0–100 km/h make daily driving easy.
  • Practical for compact-family use with 5 seats and a 311 L trunk.

Verdict

Pick Skoda Fabia II if…
Lower entry price
Skoda Fabia II starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Peugeot 208 GT Line if…
More power
Peugeot 208 GT Line puts out 130 hp vs 105 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons