Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-80 PHEV
Suv · Phev
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI
Car A
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI
The Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI prioritizes space and efficiency for large families, with seven seats, an 835-liter boot, and 6.5 L/100 km consumption. It isn’t built for performance or luxury, but it handles daily and road-trip duties capably.
7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety
Mazda CX-80 PHEV
Car B
Mazda CX-80 PHEV
The Mazda CX-80 PHEV is a seven-seat family SUV that blends everyday practicality with an efficient for its class official consumption figure. It delivers useful pace and good value in its segment for large families.
7 seatsSuvPhev1.5 L/100km200 hpPlug-in hybrid
Why compared better on fuelcomparison picksame body typesame ranking profilesame seatsstep-up price

Usage fit

Family 92 / 54
City 37 / 41
Budget / value 63 / 49
Road trip 70 / 43
Performance 26 / 24
Cargo 60 / 45
Practical 66 / 52
Premium 31 / 26
Winter 40 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI · Orange = Mazda CX-80 PHEV

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI Mazda CX-80 PHEV
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI

  • Seven seats and an 835-liter boot serve large families
  • 6.5 L/100 km consumption is efficient for its class
  • 0–100 km/h in 8.4 s delivers confident everyday pace
  • Petrol simplicity suits frequent road trips and mixed driving

Mazda CX-80 PHEV

  • Seven seats and a usable 570 L boot suit large-family duties
  • Official combined consumption of 1.5 signals efficient running for its class
  • 0–100 km/h in 6.9 s provides confident merging and passing
  • 450 Nm torque helps when the car is fully loaded

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI if…
Lower entry price
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Mazda CX-80 PHEV if…
More power
Mazda CX-80 PHEV puts out 200 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons