Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-80
Suv · Gasoline
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG
Car A
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG
A seven-seat petrol model that majors on space, practicality, and peace of mind for large families and road trips. It offers strong pace and good value in its segment, but it isn’t a premium or enthusiast pick.
7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety8 L/100km
Mazda CX-80
Car B
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 targets large families with seven seats, everyday practicality, and running costs that are efficient for its class. It balances space and performance while offering good value in its segment.
7 seatsSuvGasoline200 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 89 / 52
City 34 / 33
Budget / value 62 / 45
Road trip 68 / 42
Performance 24 / 27
Cargo 53 / 41
Practical 63 / 44
Premium 32 / 24
Winter 40 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG · Orange = Mazda CX-80

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG Mazda CX-80
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG

  • Seats seven with a generous 720-liter cargo area for family duties
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 6.5 s for confident overtakes when fully loaded
  • Efficient for its class at 8 L/100 km for commuting and touring
  • Emphasis on reliability and safety within its class

Mazda CX-80

  • Seven-seat flexibility suits large families
  • 510 L cargo space supports errands and trips
  • Efficient for its class at 8.5 L/100 km
  • 200 hp and 7.5 s 0–100 km/h aid confident merging

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG uses 8.0 L/100km vs 8.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-80 if…
More power
Mazda CX-80 puts out 200 hp vs 190 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons