Mazda CX-80
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI
Suv · Diesel
Mazda CX-80
Car A
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 targets large families with seven seats, everyday practicality, and running costs that are efficient for its class. It balances space and performance while offering good value in its segment.
7 seatsSuvGasoline200 hp
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI
Car B
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI
Efficient for its class at 5.5 L/100 km and offering seven seats plus an 835 L boot, the Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI fits large families and road trips. It prioritizes efficiency, safety signals, and cargo room over premium feel or sporty performance.
7 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety5.5 L/100km
Why compared cross branddifferent powertrainsame body typesame ranking profilesame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 52 / 93
City 33 / 38
Budget / value 45 / 66
Road trip 42 / 70
Performance 27 / 26
Cargo 41 / 60
Practical 44 / 69
Premium 24 / 31
Winter 28 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-80 · Orange = Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-80 Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-80

  • Seven-seat flexibility suits large families
  • 510 L cargo space supports errands and trips
  • Efficient for its class at 8.5 L/100 km
  • 200 hp and 7.5 s 0–100 km/h aid confident merging

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI

  • Seats seven with a very large 835 L cargo area
  • 5.5 L/100 km combined suits long-distance family travel
  • 340 Nm diesel torque helps when fully loaded
  • Strong standing in safety and cargo rankings for family needs

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-80 if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Mazda CX-80 is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI if…
Performance & capability
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons