Mazda CX-80
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI DSG
Suv · Gasoline
Mazda CX-80
Car A
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 targets large families with seven seats, everyday practicality, and running costs that are efficient for its class. It balances space and performance while offering good value in its segment.
7 seatsSuvGasoline200 hp
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI DSG
Car B
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI DSG
The Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI DSG prioritizes space, ease of use, and sensible efficiency for large families. Seven seats, a massive 835-liter boot, and calm performance make it well suited to road trips and daily hauling.
7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety6.1 L/100km
Why compared better on fuelbetter valuecomparison pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrain

Usage fit

Family 52 / 93
City 33 / 37
Budget / value 45 / 65
Road trip 42 / 70
Performance 27 / 26
Cargo 41 / 60
Practical 44 / 68
Premium 24 / 31
Winter 28 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-80 · Orange = Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI DSG

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-80 Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI DSG
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-80

  • Seven-seat flexibility suits large families
  • 510 L cargo space supports errands and trips
  • Efficient for its class at 8.5 L/100 km
  • 200 hp and 7.5 s 0–100 km/h aid confident merging

Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI DSG

  • Seven seats and an 835 L boot handle large-family and road-trip loads.
  • 6.1 l/100 km combined consumption is efficient for its class.
  • DSG automatic makes commuting and long drives easy.
  • Prioritizes reliability and safety, aligning with family needs.

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-80 if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Mazda CX-80 is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI DSG if…
Performance & capability
Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI DSG is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons