Chevrolet Spark LS
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Skoda Fabia II
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Chevrolet Spark LS
Car A
Chevrolet Spark LS
Chevrolet Spark LS leans into city driving with efficient fuel use and straightforward FWD manners, offering good value in its segment. Performance is modest, but five seats and a 313 L trunk keep it practical for daily errands.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety
Skoda Fabia II
Car B
Skoda Fabia II
Efficient for its class and easy to live with in the city, the Skoda Fabia II pairs 5 L/100km consumption with usable space for five and a 330 L trunk. It’s a good value pick for cost-conscious buyers that still want adequate performance (0–100 km/h in 9.5 s).
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5 L/100km105 hp
Why compared better on fuelcomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 54 / 62
City 75 / 77
Budget / value 71 / 76
Road trip 21 / 29
Performance 32 / 29
Cargo 17 / 18
Practical 49 / 52
Premium 10 / 13
Winter 16 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Chevrolet Spark LS · Orange = Skoda Fabia II

Specs side-by-side

Spec Chevrolet Spark LS Skoda Fabia II
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Chevrolet Spark LS

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km, ideal for stop-and-go commutes
  • Good value in its segment at a listed price of 13,995
  • Seats five with a useful 313 L trunk for everyday practicality
  • Reliability is a noted strength for routine use

Skoda Fabia II

  • Efficient for its class at 5 L/100km combined
  • Good value in its segment at a listed 15000
  • Works for small families: 5 seats and a 330 L trunk
  • Quick enough for city and highway merges (0–100 km/h in 9.5 s)

Verdict

Pick Chevrolet Spark LS if…
Lower entry price
Chevrolet Spark LS starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Skoda Fabia II if…
More power
Skoda Fabia II puts out 105 hp vs 98 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons