Skoda Roomster 1.4
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Skoda Fabia III
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Roomster 1.4
Car A
Skoda Roomster 1.4
The Skoda Roomster 1.4 focuses on everyday practicality and efficient running for city and small-family use. Its modest performance and 400 L boot make it a sensible, good-value choice in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety
Skoda Fabia III
Car B
Skoda Fabia III
A compact, city-focused 5-seater that prioritizes efficiency and everyday practicality. With 110 hp, 10.4 s to 100 km/h, and a 330 L trunk, it delivers good value in its segment for routine commuting and small-family duties.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5.4 L/100km110 hp
Why compared same body typesame brandsame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 55 / 62
City 61 / 75
Budget / value 65 / 72
Road trip 35 / 30
Performance 30 / 32
Cargo 22 / 18
Practical 49 / 52
Premium 17 / 14
Winter 22 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Roomster 1.4 · Orange = Skoda Fabia III

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Roomster 1.4 Skoda Fabia III
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Roomster 1.4

  • Efficient for its class with 6.5 l/100 km combined consumption
  • Practical 5-seat layout and 400 L trunk suit small families
  • Easy to drive in the city with relaxed 0–100 km/h in 11.2 s
  • Priced around 22000, offering good value in its segment

Skoda Fabia III

  • Efficient for its class at 5.4 L/100 km combined
  • Well suited to city driving as its primary use case
  • Five seats and a 330 L trunk cover daily needs
  • Good value in its segment around the 20000 price point

Verdict

Pick Skoda Roomster 1.4 if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Skoda Roomster 1.4 is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Skoda Fabia III if…
More power
Skoda Fabia III puts out 110 hp vs 75 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons