Nissan Kicks Turbo
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC
Crossover · Gasoline
Nissan Kicks Turbo
Car A
Nissan Kicks Turbo
The Nissan Kicks Turbo delivers good value in its segment, combining 6.5 L/100km efficiency, a 5-star safety rating, and practical 422 L cargo space. Best for city and compact-family use, it prioritizes everyday ease over premium feel or outright performance.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety128 hp
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC
Car B
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC
The Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC emphasizes low running costs and city usability while still fitting small-family needs. It’s good value in its segment, though it’s not tuned for performance.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.4 L/100km
Why compared better on fuelcomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 68 / 58
City 68 / 70
Budget / value 70 / 55
Road trip 38 / 39
Performance 26 / 27
Cargo 30 / 29
Practical 51 / 40
Premium 15 / 15
Winter 28 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Nissan Kicks Turbo · Orange = Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC

Specs side-by-side

Spec Nissan Kicks Turbo Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Nissan Kicks Turbo

  • Good value in its segment at a 19,990 price
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100km combined
  • 5-star safety rating adds confidence
  • Useful 422 L trunk for city and compact-family needs

Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC

  • Efficient for its class at 5.4 L/100km, keeping fuel bills down
  • Practical 5-seat layout and 400-litre boot for daily family use
  • City-friendly performance; 0–100 km/h in 9.8 s is adequate for urban and suburban trips
  • Strong safety standing among peers and a price around 22,000 make it good value

Verdict

Pick Nissan Kicks Turbo if…
Lower entry price
Nissan Kicks Turbo starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC if…
Performance & capability
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons