Skoda Scala 1.5 TSI
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Mazda3 2.0
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Scala 1.5 TSI
Car A
Skoda Scala 1.5 TSI
The Scala 1.5 TSI mixes efficient petrol running with brisk performance and everyday practicality at a sensible price. With five seats and a 467 L boot, it suits value‑minded commuters and growing families.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5 L/100km
Mazda3 2.0
Car B
Mazda3 2.0
A well-rounded compact with good value in its segment, the Mazda3 2.0 blends strong safety and reliability with efficient day-to-day performance. Best for city and compact-family use, less ideal for cargo-heavy needs.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 65 / 64
City 63 / 61
Budget / value 71 / 72
Road trip 43 / 40
Performance 29 / 29
Cargo 26 / 19
Practical 54 / 53
Premium 22 / 22
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Scala 1.5 TSI · Orange = Mazda3 2.0

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Scala 1.5 TSI Mazda3 2.0
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Scala 1.5 TSI

  • Efficient for its class with 5 l/100 km combined
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 8 s from 150 hp and 250 Nm
  • Generous 467 L boot supports daily errands and trips
  • Good value in its segment at this price point

Mazda3 2.0

  • Strong reliability score (85) with 5-star safety reassurance
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km
  • Lively everyday performance (0–100 km/h in 8.2 s)
  • Good value in its segment around 22,000

Verdict

Pick Skoda Scala 1.5 TSI if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Scala 1.5 TSI uses 5.0 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda3 2.0 if…
Performance & capability
Mazda3 2.0 is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons