Skoda Roomster 1.2
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Mazda2 Touring
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Roomster 1.2
Car A
Skoda Roomster 1.2
A practical 5‑seater with city‑friendly manners, low fuel use, and a roomy 450 L trunk, the Skoda Roomster 1.2 offers good value in its segment for everyday duties. Modest power and FWD make it less suited to quick highway work or harsh winter conditions.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety5.4 L/100km
Mazda2 Touring
Car B
Mazda2 Touring
The Mazda2 Touring suits city-focused buyers, combining low fuel use (5.5 L/100 km) with 5-star safety and a solid reliability score. It feels brisk enough day to day at 8.1 s to 100 km/h, but 280 L of cargo space and 115 hp keep expectations in check.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety115 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 58 / 62
City 75 / 75
Budget / value 69 / 74
Road trip 26 / 27
Performance 32 / 26
Cargo 25 / 15
Practical 53 / 52
Premium 11 / 15
Winter 16 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Roomster 1.2 · Orange = Mazda2 Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Roomster 1.2 Mazda2 Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Roomster 1.2

  • Efficient for its class at 5.4 L/100 km, helping keep running costs down
  • 450 L trunk and five seats suit growing families and errands
  • Easygoing, city‑oriented performance with simple FWD traction
  • Price aligns with good value in its segment

Mazda2 Touring

  • Good value in its segment at a price of 22,445
  • Efficient for its class at 5.5 L/100 km
  • 5-star safety rating
  • Reliability score of 85 supports low-hassle ownership

Verdict

Pick Skoda Roomster 1.2 if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Roomster 1.2 uses 5.4 L/100km vs 5.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda2 Touring if…
More power
Mazda2 Touring puts out 115 hp vs 70 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons