Mazda2 Neo
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Skoda Scala 1.0 TSI DSG
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Mazda2 Neo
Car A
Mazda2 Neo
The Mazda2 Neo prioritizes city-friendly efficiency and safety. It suits daily commuting and compact-family use more than cargo-heavy or premium-leaning needs.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Skoda Scala 1.0 TSI DSG
Car B
Skoda Scala 1.0 TSI DSG
Efficient and practical, the Skoda Scala 1.0 TSI DSG pairs a frugal 5 l/100 km with a spacious 467-liter trunk. Sensible performance and the convenience of a dual-clutch automatic make it a solid fit for city use and growing families.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5 L/100km115 hp
Why compared better on fuelcomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 59 / 67
City 75 / 63
Budget / value 72 / 72
Road trip 26 / 43
Performance 25 / 31
Cargo 13 / 26
Practical 49 / 55
Premium 14 / 21
Winter 20 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda2 Neo · Orange = Skoda Scala 1.0 TSI DSG

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda2 Neo Skoda Scala 1.0 TSI DSG
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda2 Neo

  • Efficient for its class at 5.5 L/100 km
  • 5-star safety rating
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s for confident merges
  • Reliability score of 78 supports low-stress ownership

Skoda Scala 1.0 TSI DSG

  • Efficient for its class (5 l/100 km) to keep running costs low.
  • 467-liter trunk and 5 seats support everyday family needs.
  • DSG dual-clutch automatic makes stop-start city driving easier.
  • Balanced performance (0-100 km/h in 9.5 s) works for city and highway.

Verdict

Pick Mazda2 Neo if…
Lower entry price
Mazda2 Neo starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Skoda Scala 1.0 TSI DSG if…
More power
Skoda Scala 1.0 TSI DSG puts out 115 hp vs 90 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons