Skoda Roomster GreenLine
Hatchback · Diesel · FWD
vs
Mazda2 GT
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Roomster GreenLine
Car A
Skoda Roomster GreenLine
The Skoda Roomster GreenLine prioritizes low fuel consumption and everyday practicality, making it a solid city-focused choice for growing families. With a generous boot and good value in its segment, performance is adequate rather than exciting.
5 seatsHatchbackDiesel4-star safety4.5 L/100km
Mazda2 GT
Car B
Mazda2 GT
The Mazda2 GT is efficient for its class and confidence-inspiring in daily city use, offering good value in its segment. Best for commuters and compact families who prioritize safety and reliability over outright space.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety115 hp
Why compared cross branddifferent powertrainsame body typesame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 49 / 61
City 64 / 74
Budget / value 56 / 73
Road trip 38 / 27
Performance 32 / 27
Cargo 25 / 15
Practical 42 / 51
Premium 18 / 15
Winter 22 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Roomster GreenLine · Orange = Mazda2 GT

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Roomster GreenLine Mazda2 GT
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Roomster GreenLine

  • Low fuel consumption for city use (4.5 l/100 km).
  • Generous 453 L cargo area supports family duties.
  • Calm, predictable performance for urban traffic (0–100 km/h in 11.3 s).
  • Priced at 22000, offering good value in its segment.

Mazda2 GT

  • Efficient for its class (5.6 L/100 km).
  • 5-star safety rating.
  • Reliability score of 82 supports low-hassle ownership.
  • Lively in-town acceleration (0–100 km/h in 8.5 s).

Verdict

Pick Skoda Roomster GreenLine if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Roomster GreenLine uses 4.5 L/100km vs 5.6 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda2 GT if…
More power
Mazda2 GT puts out 115 hp vs 105 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons