Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-80 PHEV
Suv · Phev
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI
Car A
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI
A seven-seat petrol family car that prioritizes space and efficiency, the Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI balances a very large cargo area with sensible consumption. It suits large families and long trips more than premium or performance seekers.
7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety
Mazda CX-80 PHEV
Car B
Mazda CX-80 PHEV
The Mazda CX-80 PHEV is a seven-seat family SUV that blends everyday practicality with an efficient for its class official consumption figure. It delivers useful pace and good value in its segment for large families.
7 seatsSuvPhev1.5 L/100km200 hpPlug-in hybrid
Why compared same body typesame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 92 / 54
City 36 / 41
Budget / value 63 / 49
Road trip 70 / 43
Performance 24 / 24
Cargo 60 / 45
Practical 65 / 52
Premium 31 / 26
Winter 40 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI · Orange = Mazda CX-80 PHEV

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Mazda CX-80 PHEV
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI

  • Seven seats and an 835-litre boot support large-family duties.
  • Efficient for its class with a 7.3 combined consumption figure.
  • Good value in its segment around 33,000.
  • Confident everyday performance (180 hp, 320 Nm, 0–100 in 6.9 s).

Mazda CX-80 PHEV

  • Seven seats and a usable 570 L boot suit large-family duties
  • Official combined consumption of 1.5 signals efficient running for its class
  • 0–100 km/h in 6.9 s provides confident merging and passing
  • 450 Nm torque helps when the car is fully loaded

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI if…
Lower entry price
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Mazda CX-80 PHEV if…
More power
Mazda CX-80 PHEV puts out 200 hp vs 180 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons