Skoda Karoq 1.6 TDI
Suv · Diesel
vs
Mazda CX-5 2.2L Diesel
Suv · Diesel
Skoda Karoq 1.6 TDI
Car A
Skoda Karoq 1.6 TDI
The Skoda Karoq 1.6 TDI focuses on family practicality and efficiency, pairing a 521 L trunk with 4.5 L/100 km consumption. Performance is modest, but its price and strong safety and cargo signals make it a sensible pick for growing families.
5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety4.5 L/100km
Mazda CX-5 2.2L Diesel
Car B
Mazda CX-5 2.2L Diesel
The Mazda CX-5 2.2L Diesel is a family-focused choice that blends efficiency, solid torque, and 5-star safety at a price that delivers good value in its segment. Best for growing families who prioritize reliability over flash.
5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety150 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 73 / 75
City 53 / 52
Budget / value 69 / 72
Road trip 53 / 54
Performance 28 / 27
Cargo 37 / 36
Practical 57 / 58
Premium 22 / 23
Winter 36 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Karoq 1.6 TDI · Orange = Mazda CX-5 2.2L Diesel

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Karoq 1.6 TDI Mazda CX-5 2.2L Diesel
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Karoq 1.6 TDI

  • Efficient for its class at 4.5 L/100 km
  • Roomy 521 L trunk and five seats suit growing families
  • Strong safety ranking signal for peace of mind
  • Priced at 27,000, it offers good value in its segment

Mazda CX-5 2.2L Diesel

  • Efficient for its class (5.5 combined consumption).
  • 5-star safety rating for family peace of mind.
  • Strong reliability score (85).
  • Practical 506-liter trunk for everyday gear.

Verdict

Pick Skoda Karoq 1.6 TDI if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Karoq 1.6 TDI uses 4.5 L/100km vs 5.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-5 2.2L Diesel if…
More power
Mazda CX-5 2.2L Diesel puts out 150 hp vs 115 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons