Skoda Citigo 1.0 TSI
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Honda Fit 2013
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Citigo 1.0 TSI
Car A
Skoda Citigo 1.0 TSI
The Skoda Citigo 1.0 TSI is tuned for efficient city driving with enough punch for everyday traffic. Four seats and a 251-liter trunk keep it practical while offering good value in its segment.
4 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety4.5 L/100km
Honda Fit 2013
Car B
Honda Fit 2013
A city-focused 5-seat FWD model that pairs a roomy 470 L trunk with efficient 5.8 L/100 km running. With reliability and safety as priorities and a 16,000 price, it offers good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety132 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 49 / 67
City 77 / 75
Budget / value 77 / 74
Road trip 19 / 31
Performance 24 / 30
Cargo 11 / 26
Practical 49 / 55
Premium 10 / 14
Winter 16 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Citigo 1.0 TSI · Orange = Honda Fit 2013

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Citigo 1.0 TSI Honda Fit 2013
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Citigo 1.0 TSI

  • Efficient for its class at 4.5 L/100 km, keeping running costs low
  • Lively 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s helps with urban merges and short trips
  • Four seats and a 251 L trunk suit daily errands and light loads
  • Strong reliability signals and a price of 15,500 make good value in its segment

Honda Fit 2013

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km for daily commuting
  • 470 L trunk and five seats handle everyday family tasks
  • Reliability and safety rank as key strengths
  • At 16,000, it represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Skoda Citigo 1.0 TSI if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Citigo 1.0 TSI uses 4.5 L/100km vs 5.8 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda Fit 2013 if…
More power
Honda Fit 2013 puts out 132 hp vs 75 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons