Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Honda Fit 2013
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC
Car A
Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC
The Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC suits city driving with very low consumption and good value in its segment. It prioritizes efficiency and simple practicality over speed and cargo capacity.
4 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety3.4 L/100km
Honda Fit 2013
Car B
Honda Fit 2013
A city-focused 5-seat FWD model that pairs a roomy 470 L trunk with efficient 5.8 L/100 km running. With reliability and safety as priorities and a 16,000 price, it offers good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety132 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 47 / 67
City 79 / 75
Budget / value 74 / 74
Road trip 18 / 31
Performance 38 / 30
Cargo 11 / 26
Practical 49 / 55
Premium 9 / 14
Winter 16 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC · Orange = Honda Fit 2013

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC Honda Fit 2013
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC

  • Very low combined consumption (3.4) keeps running costs down
  • Good value in its segment at a 15000 price point
  • 4 seats and a 251-liter trunk cover daily errands
  • Reliability ranks as a strength in our signals

Honda Fit 2013

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km for daily commuting
  • 470 L trunk and five seats handle everyday family tasks
  • Reliability and safety rank as key strengths
  • At 16,000, it represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Citigo 1.0 G-TEC uses 3.4 L/100km vs 5.8 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda Fit 2013 if…
More power
Honda Fit 2013 puts out 132 hp vs 68 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons