Skoda Citigo 1.0
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Honda Fit 2013
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Citigo 1.0
Car A
Skoda Citigo 1.0
The Skoda Citigo 1.0 focuses on city driving with very low fuel use and straightforward petrol, FWD simplicity. Performance and space are modest, but it offers good value in its segment for urban commuters.
4 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety4.5 L/100km
Honda Fit 2013
Car B
Honda Fit 2013
A city-focused 5-seat FWD model that pairs a roomy 470 L trunk with efficient 5.8 L/100 km running. With reliability and safety as priorities and a 16,000 price, it offers good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety132 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 49 / 67
City 78 / 75
Budget / value 74 / 74
Road trip 19 / 31
Performance 38 / 30
Cargo 11 / 26
Practical 49 / 55
Premium 10 / 14
Winter 16 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Citigo 1.0 · Orange = Honda Fit 2013

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Citigo 1.0 Honda Fit 2013
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Citigo 1.0

  • Efficient for its class at 4.5 l/100km
  • 15,000 price point offers good value in its segment
  • Four seats and a 251-liter trunk cover daily needs
  • Strong reliability signal in rankings

Honda Fit 2013

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km for daily commuting
  • 470 L trunk and five seats handle everyday family tasks
  • Reliability and safety rank as key strengths
  • At 16,000, it represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Skoda Citigo 1.0 if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Citigo 1.0 uses 4.5 L/100km vs 5.8 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda Fit 2013 if…
More power
Honda Fit 2013 puts out 132 hp vs 75 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons