Skoda Octavia RS III
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Honda Fit 2009
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Octavia RS III
Car A
Skoda Octavia RS III
The Skoda Octavia RS III blends real-world pace with family practicality and good value in its segment. Strong reliability and safety emphasis plus a 590 L trunk make it easy to live with.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.4 L/100km245 hp
Honda Fit 2009
Car B
Honda Fit 2009
The 2009 Honda Fit blends five-seat practicality with efficient 1.5L performance and a notably large 712 L cargo area for family and city use. Signals point to strong reliability and safety at a price that represents good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 71 / 76
City 60 / 74
Budget / value 67 / 74
Road trip 46 / 37
Performance 34 / 30
Cargo 33 / 40
Practical 57 / 61
Premium 25 / 13
Winter 26 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Octavia RS III · Orange = Honda Fit 2009

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Octavia RS III Honda Fit 2009
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Octavia RS III

  • Strong reliability and safety focus for family peace of mind
  • Quick yet efficient for its class: 6.7 s and 6.4 L/100 km
  • Huge 590 L trunk and five seats suit growing families
  • Good value in its segment around 30,000

Honda Fit 2009

  • Versatile 712 L cargo space supports growing families and errands
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km for city and commuting
  • Signals emphasize strong reliability and safety priorities
  • At 15,990, represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Skoda Octavia RS III if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Octavia RS III uses 6.4 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda Fit 2009 if…
Performance & capability
Honda Fit 2009 is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons