Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Ford Territory ST
Suv · Gasoline
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI
Car A
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI
The Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI focuses on everyday practicality and low running costs for city and small-family use. Its 5-seat cabin and 400-liter boot pair with efficient 5.3 L/100 km consumption, though outright performance is modest.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety5.3 L/100km
Ford Territory ST
Car B
Ford Territory ST
The Ford Territory ST mixes strong performance with practical five-seat usability at a price that represents good value in its segment. It suits city driving and small-family duties with reasonable day-to-day efficiency.
5 seatsSuvGasoline243 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profile

Usage fit

Family 70 / 42
City 65 / 46
Budget / value 71 / 47
Road trip 40 / 39
Performance 27 / 27
Cargo 30 / 33
Practical 54 / 38
Premium 15 / 17
Winter 30 / 24

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI · Orange = Ford Territory ST

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI Ford Territory ST
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI

  • Good value in its segment at around 21,000
  • Efficient for its class at 5.3 L/100 km, lowering fuel bills
  • Practical 5-seat layout and 400 L boot for small-family needs
  • 200 Nm torque and 9.8 s 0-100 km/h are adequate for city and commuting

Ford Territory ST

  • Strong power and quick acceleration for confident passing and merging
  • Five seats and a usable 448-liter trunk for everyday family tasks
  • Combined consumption of 8.5 L/100 km is efficient for its class
  • Around 30,000 pricing offers good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI uses 5.3 L/100km vs 8.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Territory ST if…
More power
Ford Territory ST puts out 243 hp vs 115 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons