Ford Taurus (1996-1999)
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Skoda Superb iV
Sedan · Phev · FWD
Ford Taurus (1996-1999)
Car A
Ford Taurus (1996-1999)
With a V6, FWD, and a 540 L trunk, the 1996–1999 Taurus offers good value for budget-focused buyers and works well for road trips.
5 seatsSedanGasoline4-star safety
Skoda Superb iV
Car B
Skoda Superb iV
The Skoda Superb iV pairs family-ready space with plug-in hybrid efficiency, offering 55 km electric range and very low official consumption. With solid performance and a large trunk, it suits commuters and family road trips.
5 seatsSedanPhev5-star safety1.4 L/100km218 hpPlug-in hybrid
Why compared same body typesame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 56 / 68
City 36 / 43
Budget / value 61 / 63
Road trip 59 / 62
Performance 32 / 32
Cargo 30 / 35
Practical 39 / 54
Premium 24 / 36
Winter 26 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Taurus (1996-1999) · Orange = Skoda Superb iV

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Taurus (1996-1999) Skoda Superb iV
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Taurus (1996-1999)

  • 540 L trunk suits road trips and family cargo
  • V6 with 244 Nm and 9.0 s 0–100 km/h is adequate for everyday passing
  • 10.2 L/100 km combined is efficient for its class
  • Price of 18995 represents good value in its segment

Skoda Superb iV

  • Roomy 5-seat interior with a 625‑litre trunk suits growing families and road trips.
  • Efficient for its class: low official combined consumption and 55 km electric range for daily commuting.
  • Strong everyday performance from 218 hp and 400 Nm, with 0–100 km/h in 7.3 s.
  • Good value in its segment for the space–efficiency balance.

Verdict

Pick Ford Taurus (1996-1999) if…
Lower entry price
Ford Taurus (1996-1999) starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Skoda Superb iV if…
More power
Skoda Superb iV puts out 218 hp vs 145 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons