CarDirectory
Browse all
Skoda Kamiq Monte Carlo
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Ford Puma Active
Crossover · Gasoline
Skoda Kamiq Monte Carlo
Car A
Skoda Kamiq Monte Carlo
The Skoda Kamiq Monte Carlo balances city-friendly ease with family practicality, pairing efficient running (combined consumption 5.5) with a usable 400-liter trunk. It is good value in its segment if you prioritize efficiency and everyday comfort over premium flair or track-ready performance.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.5 L/100km
Ford Puma Active
Car B
Ford Puma Active
The Ford Puma Active prioritizes city-friendly efficiency and practicality, with a roomy 456 L boot and five seats backed by 5.7 L/100 km consumption. It represents good value in its segment, but it’s not aimed at premium or performance seekers.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety155 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar price

Usage fit

Family 58 / 69
City 68 / 69
Budget / value 52 / 68
Road trip 39 / 40
Performance 26 / 27
Cargo 29 / 32
Practical 40 / 53
Premium 17 / 16
Winter 28 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kamiq Monte Carlo · Orange = Ford Puma Active

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kamiq Monte Carlo Ford Puma Active
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kamiq Monte Carlo

  • Efficient for its class at 5.5 combined consumption.
  • Quick enough for daily traffic with 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s and 150 hp.
  • Practical five-seat layout and 400-liter trunk for small-family duties.
  • Strong safety standing in segment signals.

Ford Puma Active

  • Efficient for its class at 5.7 L/100 km, easing daily fuel use.
  • Generous 456 L trunk supports errands and family weekends.
  • Balanced everyday performance (0–100 km/h in 9.0 s, 155 hp, 240 Nm).
  • Five-seat versatility and a 25,000 price point offer good value in its segment.

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kamiq Monte Carlo if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Kamiq Monte Carlo uses 5.5 L/100km vs 5.7 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Puma Active if…
More power
Ford Puma Active puts out 155 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons

Need more space?
Chevrolet Trailblazer RS
same body type
Something faster?
Mazda CX-5 Touring
same body type
A strong alternative?
Volkswagen T-Roc 1.5 TSI
same body type
A strong alternative?
Honda HR-V 1.8X
same body type
A strong alternative?
Toyota Corolla Cross
same body type
A strong alternative?
Volkswagen T-Roc 1.0 TSI
same body type