Ford Puma Active vs Skoda Kamiq 1.5 G-TEC

Ford Puma Active

Crossover · Gasoline

Skoda Kamiq 1.5 G-TEC

Crossover · Gasoline

Car A

Ford Puma Active

The Ford Puma Active prioritizes city-friendly efficiency and practicality, with a roomy 456 L boot and five seats backed by 5.7 L/100 km consumption. It represents good value in its segment, but it’s not aimed at premium or performance seekers.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety155 hp

Car B

Skoda Kamiq 1.5 G-TEC

Skoda Kamiq 1.5 G-TEC blends efficient running with family-friendly practicality for compact-family and city use. With a 400-liter trunk, five seats, and 0–100 km/h in 8.4 s, it offers good value in its segment at 24,000.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.4 L/100km

Why compared better on fuelbetter valuecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 69 / 58

City 69 / 57

Budget / value 68 / 55

Road trip 40 / 49

Performance 27 / 26

Cargo 32 / 29

Practical 53 / 40

Premium 16 / 22

Winter 28 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma Active · Orange = Skoda Kamiq 1.5 G-TEC

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma Active Skoda Kamiq 1.5 G-TEC

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma Active

Efficient for its class at 5.7 L/100 km, easing daily fuel use.
Generous 456 L trunk supports errands and family weekends.
Balanced everyday performance (0–100 km/h in 9.0 s, 155 hp, 240 Nm).
Five-seat versatility and a 25,000 price point offer good value in its segment.
Not for performance driving; 0–100 km/h in 9.0 s and 155 hp emphasize usability over thrills.
Only five seats, so larger families may need more capacity.
If you want premium branding or upscale interiors, this model isn’t positioned as premium.
Shoppers chasing the absolute lowest purchase price may find smaller city cars cheaper.

Skoda Kamiq 1.5 G-TEC

Efficient for its class with a combined 5.4 consumption figure.
Brisk everyday performance: 150 hp, 250 Nm, 0–100 km/h in 8.4 s.
Practical layout with five seats and a useful 400-liter boot.
Sensible price at 24,000 makes for good value in its segment.
Not aimed at performance enthusiasts despite decent acceleration.
Those seeking a premium feel or features may want alternatives.
Only five seats, so larger families may outgrow it.
If you need more than 400 liters of cargo space, a bigger vehicle fits better.

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma Active if…

Efficiency & everyday ease

Ford Puma Active is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.

Pick Skoda Kamiq 1.5 G-TEC if…

Performance & capability

Skoda Kamiq 1.5 G-TEC is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Ford Puma Active

Skoda Kamiq 1.5 G-TEC

Verdict

Related comparisons