Car A
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC
The Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC emphasizes low running costs and city usability while still fitting small-family needs. It’s good value in its segment, though it’s not tuned for performance.
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Ford Puma Active
Crossover · Gasoline
Car B
Ford Puma Active
The Ford Puma Active prioritizes city-friendly efficiency and practicality, with a roomy 456 L boot and five seats backed by 5.7 L/100 km consumption. It represents good value in its segment, but it’s not aimed at premium or performance seekers.
Why compared
same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar price
Usage fit
Family
58
/
69
City
70
/
69
Budget / value
55
/
68
Road trip
39
/
40
Performance
27
/
27
Cargo
29
/
32
Practical
40
/
53
Premium
15
/
16
Winter
28
/
28
Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC · Orange = Ford Puma Active
Specs side-by-side
Spec
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC
Ford Puma Active
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.
Pros & cons
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC
- Efficient for its class at 5.4 L/100km, keeping fuel bills down
- Practical 5-seat layout and 400-litre boot for daily family use
- City-friendly performance; 0–100 km/h in 9.8 s is adequate for urban and suburban trips
- Strong safety standing among peers and a price around 22,000 make it good value
- You want brisk acceleration or sporty dynamics; 115 hp and 9.8 s to 100 km/h are modest
- You expect a premium-feeling cabin and features; this focuses on practicality
- You need more than five seats or very large cargo space beyond 400 litres
- You prefer hybrid or electric power; this is petrol-only
Ford Puma Active
- Efficient for its class at 5.7 L/100 km, easing daily fuel use.
- Generous 456 L trunk supports errands and family weekends.
- Balanced everyday performance (0–100 km/h in 9.0 s, 155 hp, 240 Nm).
- Five-seat versatility and a 25,000 price point offer good value in its segment.
- Not for performance driving; 0–100 km/h in 9.0 s and 155 hp emphasize usability over thrills.
- Only five seats, so larger families may need more capacity.
- If you want premium branding or upscale interiors, this model isn’t positioned as premium.
- Shoppers chasing the absolute lowest purchase price may find smaller city cars cheaper.
Verdict
Pick Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 G-TEC uses 5.4 L/100km vs 5.7 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Puma Active if…
More power
Ford Puma Active puts out 155 hp vs 115 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.