Skoda Kamiq Style
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Ford Puma
Crossover · Gasoline
Skoda Kamiq Style
Car A
Skoda Kamiq Style
Efficient and city-focused, the Skoda Kamiq Style pairs 5.5 L/100 km consumption with brisk 0–100 km/h in 8 s. With seating for five and a 400 L trunk at around 25,000, it suits small families seeking good value in its segment.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.5 L/100km
Ford Puma
Car B
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma offers good value in its segment, pairing efficient petrol running with practical five-seat space for city and family duties. It leans on reliability and safety rather than premium trimmings or performance thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety155 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 58 / 71
City 69 / 57
Budget / value 54 / 72
Road trip 39 / 49
Performance 25 / 22
Cargo 29 / 32
Practical 40 / 55
Premium 16 / 22
Winter 28 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kamiq Style · Orange = Ford Puma

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kamiq Style Ford Puma
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kamiq Style

  • Efficient for its class at 5.5 L/100 km, helping keep running costs down
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 8 s makes city merges and short on-ramps easier
  • Practical 5-seat layout and 400 L trunk for small-family duties
  • Around 25,000, offering good value in its segment

Ford Puma

  • Emphasis on reliability and safety for daily use
  • Good value in its segment for budget-focused buyers
  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km
  • Five seats and a 456 L trunk suit growing-family needs

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kamiq Style if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Kamiq Style uses 5.5 L/100km vs 5.8 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Puma if…
More power
Ford Puma puts out 155 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons