Skoda Scala 1.6 TDI
Hatchback · Diesel · FWD
vs
Ford Focus Active
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Skoda Scala 1.6 TDI
Car A
Skoda Scala 1.6 TDI
The Skoda Scala 1.6 TDI emphasizes efficiency and everyday practicality, pairing 4 l/100 km consumption with a roomy 467 L boot. It’s a sensible fit for budget-focused buyers balancing city commutes with small-family needs.
5 seatsHatchbackDiesel5-star safety4 L/100km
Ford Focus Active
Car B
Ford Focus Active
A compact, city-friendly five-seater that balances efficiency and pace at a price that makes sense for small families. Best for urban commuting; less ideal if you need lots of cargo room or premium trimmings.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety180 hp
Why compared cross branddifferent powertrainsame body typesame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 65 / 54
City 65 / 63
Budget / value 72 / 55
Road trip 43 / 41
Performance 32 / 30
Cargo 26 / 20
Practical 55 / 39
Premium 21 / 22
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Scala 1.6 TDI · Orange = Ford Focus Active

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Scala 1.6 TDI Ford Focus Active
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Scala 1.6 TDI

  • Efficient for its class with 4 l/100 km combined consumption.
  • 467 L trunk and five seats offer everyday family practicality.
  • 300 Nm torque supports relaxed cruising and flexible everyday driving.
  • At 22000, it represents good value in its segment.

Ford Focus Active

  • Efficient for city commutes at 5.5 L/100km
  • Strong 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s helps with confident merging
  • Five-seat practicality suits small families
  • Priced at 22,000, representing good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Skoda Scala 1.6 TDI if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Scala 1.6 TDI uses 4.0 L/100km vs 5.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Focus Active if…
More power
Ford Focus Active puts out 180 hp vs 115 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons