Skoda Enyaq iV 80
Suv · Electric · AWD
vs
Ford Equator ST
Suv · Electric · AWD
Skoda Enyaq iV 80
Car A
Skoda Enyaq iV 80
With long range, a big boot, and AWD, the Enyaq iV 80 suits road trips and growing families who need real space. It favors comfort and practicality over outright performance or bargain pricing.
5 seatsSuvElectric5-star safetyAWDElectric
Ford Equator ST
Car B
Ford Equator ST
An electric AWD five-seater with strong power and a usable 500 km range, the Ford Equator ST fits city duty and growing families. It balances performance and practicality, but it isn’t aimed at strict budgets or severe-winter use.
5 seatsSuvElectric350 hpAWDElectric
Why compared more powercomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame seatsstep-up price

Usage fit

Family 67 / 42
City 33 / 43
Budget / value 30 / 24
Road trip 67 / 40
Performance 25 / 33
Cargo 40 / 33
Practical 33 / 30
Premium 34 / 26
Winter 40 / 24

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Enyaq iV 80 · Orange = Ford Equator ST

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Enyaq iV 80 Ford Equator ST
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Enyaq iV 80

  • Up to 537 km range reduces charging stops on long trips
  • 585 L trunk handles family luggage and bulky cargo
  • AWD traction adds confidence in mixed weather
  • Five-seat layout fits a growing family without upsizing

Ford Equator ST

  • AWD adds traction for everyday routes
  • 350 hp and 500 Nm make passing and merging easy
  • 500 km range supports city weeks and weekend getaways
  • Five seats and a 450 L trunk handle daily family needs

Verdict

Pick Skoda Enyaq iV 80 if…
Lower entry price
Skoda Enyaq iV 80 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Ford Equator ST if…
More power
Ford Equator ST puts out 350 hp vs 204 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons