Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Ford EcoSport Titanium
Suv · Gasoline
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI
Car A
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI
The Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI focuses on everyday practicality and low running costs for city and small-family use. Its 5-seat cabin and 400-liter boot pair with efficient 5.3 L/100 km consumption, though outright performance is modest.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety5.3 L/100km
Ford EcoSport Titanium
Car B
Ford EcoSport Titanium
The Ford EcoSport Titanium focuses on efficiency and everyday usability, delivering good value in its segment for budget-focused city and family-compact needs. Performance is adequate rather than exciting, and it isn’t aimed at premium-shopping audiences.
5 seatsSuvGasoline4-star safety123 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar price

Usage fit

Family 70 / 61
City 65 / 51
Budget / value 71 / 68
Road trip 40 / 45
Performance 27 / 26
Cargo 30 / 28
Practical 54 / 50
Premium 15 / 18
Winter 30 / 32

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI · Orange = Ford EcoSport Titanium

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI Ford EcoSport Titanium
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI

  • Good value in its segment at around 21,000
  • Efficient for its class at 5.3 L/100 km, lowering fuel bills
  • Practical 5-seat layout and 400 L boot for small-family needs
  • 200 Nm torque and 9.8 s 0-100 km/h are adequate for city and commuting

Ford EcoSport Titanium

  • Good value in its segment at 21,999
  • Efficient for its class with 6.5 L/100 km combined
  • Nippy in town; 0–100 km/h in 9.8 s helps with merges
  • Practical 5-seat layout with a 362 L trunk for daily tasks

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI if…
Best fuel economy
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI uses 5.3 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford EcoSport Titanium if…
More power
Ford EcoSport Titanium puts out 123 hp vs 115 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons