Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI vs Chevrolet Traverse 2023 — full comparison

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI

Suv · Gasoline

vs

Chevrolet Traverse 2023

Suv · Gasoline

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI

Car A

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI

With seven seats, an 835 L boot, and 6.4 L/100 km combined consumption, the Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI is a practical, efficient choice for large families and road trips. It prioritizes space and sensible running costs over premium flash or outright performance.

7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety6.4 L/100km

Chevrolet Traverse 2023

Car B

Chevrolet Traverse 2023

The 2023 Chevrolet Traverse balances eight-seat practicality, ample cargo space, and straightforward power for families and road trips. It favors utility and safety over city-friendly efficiency or sporty dynamics.

8 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety310 hp

Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 83 / 94

City 37 / 30

Budget / value 49 / 56

Road trip 70 / 76

Performance 26 / 33

Cargo 60 / 83

Practical 54 / 63

Premium 30 / 34

Winter 40 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI · Orange = Chevrolet Traverse 2023

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Chevrolet Traverse 2023

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI

Seven-seat flexibility and an 835 L boot suit large families and cargo-heavy trips.
Efficient for its class at 6.4 L/100 km, helping keep running costs in check.
Adequate acceleration (0–100 km/h in 8.4 s) and 250 Nm torque make daily driving easy.
Priced around 33,000, offering good value in its segment.
Not for performance-focused drivers; 150 hp and 202 km/h top speed are modest.
Petrol-only powertrain may not suit buyers seeking hybrid or EV efficiency.
If you rarely need more than five seats, you may be paying for space you won’t use.
Those seeking a premium-badge experience may prefer upscale alternatives.

Chevrolet Traverse 2023

Seats up to 8 for growing families and carpool duty
Expansive cargo capacity (2790 L) handles gear-heavy travel
Strong power for confident passing and merging (310 hp, 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s)
Five-star safety rating supports family peace of mind
Combined consumption of 10.3 may disappoint if fuel economy is a top priority
Less suited to stop-and-go city driving, per its usage focus
Performance enthusiasts may want sharper dynamics than its 8.0 s 0–100 km/h allows
If you don’t need eight seats or very large cargo space, it may be more vehicle than you require

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI if…

Best fuel economy

Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI uses 6.4 L/100km vs 10.3 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Chevrolet Traverse 2023 if…

More power

Chevrolet Traverse 2023 puts out 310 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons