Chevrolet Spark LS
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Skoda Fabia I
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Chevrolet Spark LS
Car A
Chevrolet Spark LS
Chevrolet Spark LS leans into city driving with efficient fuel use and straightforward FWD manners, offering good value in its segment. Performance is modest, but five seats and a 313 L trunk keep it practical for daily errands.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety98 hp
Skoda Fabia I
Car B
Skoda Fabia I
The Skoda Fabia I suits city driving and value-minded buyers, pairing efficient fuel use with straightforward practicality. Modest power is adequate for commuting, with a 330 L trunk and seating for five covering daily needs.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety5.5 L/100km
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 54 / 55
City 75 / 76
Budget / value 71 / 75
Road trip 21 / 24
Performance 32 / 29
Cargo 17 / 18
Practical 49 / 52
Premium 10 / 10
Winter 16 / 16

Scores out of 100. Blue = Chevrolet Spark LS · Orange = Skoda Fabia I

Specs side-by-side

Spec Chevrolet Spark LS Skoda Fabia I
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Chevrolet Spark LS

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km, ideal for stop-and-go commutes
  • Good value in its segment at a listed price of 13,995
  • Seats five with a useful 313 L trunk for everyday practicality
  • Reliability is a noted strength for routine use

Skoda Fabia I

  • Efficient 5.5 L/100 km helps keep running costs low.
  • Predictable FWD and easy-going performance work well in urban traffic.
  • 330 L trunk offers useful cargo room for errands and small trips.
  • Around 15,000 price point delivers good value in its segment.

Verdict

Pick Chevrolet Spark LS if…
Lower entry price
Chevrolet Spark LS starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Skoda Fabia I if…
Performance & capability
Skoda Fabia I is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons