Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Audi Q8 55 TFSI e
Suv · Hybrid · AWD
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI
Car A
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI
With a roomy 521-liter boot and efficient 6.3 combined consumption, the Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI fits growing families seeking good value. It delivers brisk everyday pace without premium or performance-car pretensions.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety
Audi Q8 55 TFSI e
Car B
Audi Q8 55 TFSI e
The Audi Q8 55 TFSI e balances strong V6 plug-in hybrid performance with efficient-for-its-class running and a usable 47 km electric range. Best for road trips and growing families wanting AWD confidence and a spacious 605-liter cargo area.
5 seatsSuvHybrid5-star safety2.5 L/100km340 hpAWDHybrid
Why compared same body typesame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 73 / 67
City 50 / 34
Budget / value 65 / 32
Road trip 53 / 76
Performance 23 / 38
Cargo 37 / 42
Practical 54 / 49
Premium 24 / 67
Winter 36 / 80

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI · Orange = Audi Q8 55 TFSI e

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI Audi Q8 55 TFSI e
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI

  • 521-liter boot supports family gear and trips
  • Efficient for its class at 6.3 combined consumption
  • 0–100 km/h in 6.4 s provides confident merging and overtaking
  • Priced at 30,400, it offers good value in its segment

Audi Q8 55 TFSI e

  • Quick 0-100 km/h in 5.4 s and AWD traction suit confident highway passing and winter travel
  • Efficient for its class: 2.5 L/100 km combined when charged, plus 47 km EV range for short trips
  • Generous 605-liter boot and five-seat layout work well for family gear and road trips
  • Strong 340 hp and 500 Nm V6 hybrid provides brisk performance

Verdict

Pick Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI if…
Lower entry price
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Audi Q8 55 TFSI e if…
All-wheel drive
Audi Q8 55 TFSI e's AWD adds real-world confidence in wet, icy, or mixed-weather conditions.

Related comparisons