Audi Q7 60 TFSI e vs Skoda Kodiaq RS

Audi Q7 60 TFSI e

Suv · Hybrid · AWD

Skoda Kodiaq RS

Suv · Diesel

Car A

Audi Q7 60 TFSI e

A spacious AWD plug-in SUV for large families, the Q7 60 TFSI e combines seven-seat flexibility and an 865 L boot with efficient-for-its-class running when you can use its 43 km electric range. Less ideal for tight city use or buyers seeking sharp handling thrills.

7 seatsSuvHybrid5-star safety2.6 L/100km462 hpAWDHybrid

Car B

Skoda Kodiaq RS

The Skoda Kodiaq RS suits large families who want seven seats and a huge 835-liter trunk without giving up brisk performance. It’s efficient for its class and better suited to road trips than city shuttling.

7 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety

Why compared same body typesame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 93 / 92

City 35 / 30

Budget / value 50 / 50

Road trip 80 / 71

Performance 44 / 27

Cargo 61 / 60

Practical 71 / 63

Premium 67 / 38

Winter 80 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi Q7 60 TFSI e · Orange = Skoda Kodiaq RS

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi Q7 60 TFSI e Skoda Kodiaq RS

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi Q7 60 TFSI e

Seven seats and an 865 L cargo area support large-family duties and road trips.
43 km electric range and a 17.3 kWh battery can cover short commutes and school runs.
Low combined consumption (2.6 L/100 km) when charged regularly helps cut fuel use.
AWD and strong output (462 hp, 700 Nm; 0–100 km/h in 5.7 s) enable confident long-distance travel.
43 km EV range may feel limited for longer daily commutes.
Best efficiency requires frequent charging; without it, gains diminish.
Large SUV footprint is less convenient in dense city driving and parking.
High purchase price at 74,900.

Skoda Kodiaq RS

Seven seats and an 835-liter trunk make it easy for large families and luggage.
Strong passing power from 245 hp and 500 Nm with a 6.6 s 0–100.
Efficient for its class with a combined consumption of 8.3, good for long trips.
Safety ranks as a strength in its positioning, matching family priorities.
Less convenient for tight city use and short hops.
Not tuned for hardcore performance driving despite its badge.
Price of 55,000 may exceed some family-car budgets.
If you won’t use three rows or the big boot, a smaller model could fit better.

Verdict

Pick Audi Q7 60 TFSI e if…

Best fuel economy

Audi Q7 60 TFSI e uses 2.6 L/100km vs 8.3 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Skoda Kodiaq RS if…

Performance & capability

Skoda Kodiaq RS is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Audi Q7 60 TFSI e

Skoda Kodiaq RS

Verdict

Related comparisons